Ever since I moved to this kidney shaped country on the tip of the Arabian peninsula, almost 20 years ago, there have been questions. At first, friends wanted to know what it was like in Dubai.

“I’m sure Dubai is great,” I would reply. “But I live in Doha.”

The distance between these two Gulf Cooperation Council countries isn’t much. (About 400 miles). But having found oil in the late ’60s, the United Arab Emirates had their boom decades before Qatar. And their flagship state, Dubai, was the centerpiece of their self branding and modernization project. A tourist haven, with the world’s tallest building, and indoor ski slope, and, and, and ad infinitum on the superlatives. Dubai quickly become synonymous as a playground for western snowbirds and wealthy Asians.

So when I moved to Doha, the smaller, quieter city state nearby, I was happy to live somewhere the nationals hadn’t surrendered their public spaces but were rather trying to share malls, cinemas, and roadways with people from all over the world who were powering their economy.

“No I don’t have to cover my hair. At 105F, hot is hot, even if it’s dry heat. Yes, we have McDonald’s. And women have had the right to drive since the ’90s.”

This sequence became my litany on visits home or during encounters with strangers while on travels elsewhere. (If they were particularly good listeners I would get into the humidity, which adds, no kidding, upwards of 50-100% to the overall temp).

While it was a conservative country, compared to most of her neighbors, Qatar was the liberal sister; there was alcohol on sale (with a hefty import tax), pork (at one state authorized seller), nightclubs, plus university classrooms bursting with twice the number of young women versus men.

People didn’t seem to be able to reconcile these facts with what they had been shown on the nightly news.

Sadly I had no photos of pet tigers, oil wells, or my personal doctor living in the backyard. Between the media stereotype and my everyday life is where I lived, minding my own business.

When the questions changed.

How, how could I live there when there were so many human rights abuses?

Now this new threat in the conversation really puzzled me because the people who were asking, my friends, relatives, strangers at the beach, were themselves living through some of the most complex social challenges of the 21st century. There were migrants seeking asylum in their country, or people being sent ‘back’ to places they had never lived, because their grandparents had migrated during an era and Empire that no longer existed.

But I came to accept it as my role, as someone with a PhD in postcolonial literature, who studied identity, power, and culture, to have these conversations during the summers, at conferences, on cruise ships. Whenever I could, I would gently nudge the questioner towards reckoning with the contradiction in looking outward with blanket statements, and yet, assuming that the human rights gaps under their noses were the exception – not the rule – for their own societies.

“I’ll never come visit Qatar because of the rights violations,” someone said to me one summer.

Okay. That’s your prerogative. Okay. But, as we’re talking about rights…

“On my way here, I passed a cop. I made sure to come to a full stop at the sign and let him go first. Because if you and I run a stop sign, either of us, just up the road here, who do you think is driving away? And who has a chance of being shot?”

Oh, but the cops could see you’re not black, this same bastion of human rights declared. “You would be fine.”

Sort of missing the point entirely – (And this conversation was years before the Black Lives Matter movement). Because if some of your citizens are not treated equally, then — …

That’s not to say that there aren’t labor issues and social stratification in Qatar; there are – and they are so many and so complex, that I unexpectedly found myself right in the middle of them as a South Asian American woman. I had to write a book to help me sort through a myriad of experiences in the early years. But the contradictory undercurrent of the rhetoric seemed to rely on giving one’s own country a pass on whatever issues its residents were facing and turning a critical eye outward.

In 2010, when Qatar won the bid to host the World Cup, I was sitting on the couch with my husband. We were debating how much longer we live here, since the initial one year assignment had already morphed into 5. If they get it, we agreed, we would stay. We had been at the opening ceremonies of the 2006 Asian Games and seen the development – road expansion, new stadia, more jobs – that an international sporting event could create.

So when that envelope was opened, and they said Qatar, we jumped up and down with all the excitement of the Qatari delegation.

The immediate vitriol, from the general public, and people I knew up close, was a surprise.

Why in the desert? Why them? What makes them worthy? Why not some place more established?
(Why not us? was the implication)

This would crop up, off and on, over the next 12 years.

And alongside came reforms; to labor practices, the establishment of an International Labor Office in Doha. Standardization of payment practices, the release of a “No Objection” letter requirement to transfer sponsors.

Baby steps maybe, but considerable ones for a place that was very sensitive to the influx of outsiders, and ones that definitely wouldn’t have happened without being a host nation. We didn’t see any social change in China despite having been an Olympic host nation. Let’s celebrate the wins, however much work there remains.

We can definitely talk about the lack of safety protocols on construction sites, how walls can fall over and kill men (for they are all exclusively male) building universities (and have) or malls or houses, as much as stadia. That a system that relies on the unpaid to come forward and register their cases can get quickly backlogged. Or while there has been some progress, there is still much to be done in terms of integrating blue collar laborers across the socio-economic divide into public life.

Headlines continue to heat up in what will be weeks until the opening ceremonies, preying on these stereotypes about Qatar that are a toxic intersection between Islamaphobia (BUT THEIR WOMEN!), xenophobia and misinformation.

For example, the number of deaths related to stadia creation – each one is a tragedy – is not 6,500.

I hope the global championing of the plight of the largely male, South Asian labor force isn’t only interesting because it is a reason Qatar should not be hosting the World Cup. Because they, and a wide range of blue collar workers, will be here long after the winning nation takes the FIFA trophy home.

And the voices who will speak out against Islamophobia will also continue to rise.

If there are things to criticize about FIFA 2022, let them be because a tiny nation climbed on the global stage to hold her own and had growing pains along the way. For how else do nations or people learn how to do new things?

What a wild, wacky, and unpredictable year this has been! All over the world, we have been cooped up at home – frustratingly at different times :). Lockdown came with the unexpected gift of time. For any writer that is a tremendous bonus. And for me that led to adapting a few of my novels into screenplays.

Longtime readers of this newsletter might have flicked through Coloured and Other Stories, a short story collection I wrote in graduate school and published in 2013. Fast forward 7 years and the screenplay of one of the short stories, “Down” was a semi-finalist in the Austin Film Festival.  Add another year, and we are in production for an excerpt from that feature screenplay. This is known as a ‘short’ in the film industry. Shorts help writers/producers/directors/actors gain the attention of audiences and agents. Me Against the World is an excerpt of the larger story.75% female led (writer/producers/director)Filming in Nashville, TN. Currently at 15% funded  This is the story of an unlikely friendship between a quiet Indian American girl, Mala, and an ambitious African American boy, Doug. Their dislocation and confusion is semi-autobiographical and based on my own upbringing in a largely Caucasian town as the child of Indian immigrants. Sprinkled throughout are moments of comedy, culture, and sports. We are taken from Mala’s Hindu household to packed basketball stadiums, from their rural North Carolina town to the capital, and then, triumphantly, to New York City.  . Read more about the film and how you can get involved here. There are tons of extra perks for backing, from walk-on roles as extras, to visits to the set. Could be the perfect gift for an upcoming birthday, father figure or film aficionado. If you’ve got an idea for a custom gift, please hit reply on this email and let us know! A generous donor has offered to match any contributions made from Qatar over the next week (or Florida, my other hometown). They are counting anyone who has lived in either place as being ‘from there.’  Because, as you know, for this cultural nomad, it couldn’t be any other way. How has the past year been for you?

Since many of us find ourselves indoors more often these days, maybe you’ve started wondering how this pandemic got its name. The current outbreak was named the Coronavirus or Covid19 because in 2015 the WHO set guidelines to avoid unfair practices in the naming of pandemics. And there have been a few cultural slip-ups that affect how a disease is viewed by the general public.

Perhaps the one we all remember first hearing about was AIDS, the silent killer that tore through the gay community. Was it God’s judgment on an immoral lifestyle as some religious conservatives said, sharing knowing looks? Or was it a blood born virus transmitted by bodily fluids? The early days of public opinion were difficult to shift and held up AIDS treatment for decades.

“Hong Kong residents in 2003 hated the name SARS because they saw in the initialism a specific reference to their city’s status as a Special Administrative Region in China. Even though the name stood for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (incidentally also in the coronavirus group) the similarities were too eye-catching.

Leaders of Saudi Arabia didn’t much like it when Dutch researchers called a coronavirus HCoV-KSA1 ten years later—that stands for Human Coronavirus, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Its eventual standardized name, Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome, still ended up sounding like it was blaming the entire region.”

Adam Rogers, “Coronovirus Has a Name”

You might have heard the current US administration more recently refer to the Covid19 outbreak as a Chinese virus. The sudden switch from Coronavirus, as recently as March 8th, made many media outlets, celebrities and regular people sit up and take notice. As people began pointing out the racist underpinnings of such a label, the administration dug its heels in. Even when specifically asked to reassure the Asian American community, many of whom are worried about or had already receiving tangential hate speech/attacks, none was forthcoming.

Ramping up rhetoric around a Chinese virus serves several purposes. None of which are in the interests of the global community or the type of international collaboration urgently needed to halt the spread of new cases. We don’t need division right now. The people and governments of the world need more collaboration.

But that’s only if you are looking after the greater good. The Chinese virus label is important if there are other items on your agenda. Let’s hope we can start talking about them as well as social distancing precautions. Here are a few that come to mind.

A Common Enemy

The scale of the medical crisis that is building in the US has been previewed in Italy and now Spain. Harsh realities are being forecast: these include running out of hospital beds for patients (along with ventilators and other necessary equipment) plus protective gear for medical staff (from masks to sanitize). And all of that fear and misery need a common enemy. That is outside America and this administration.

Enter: China.

A country long on the worry list because of their communist government. Who then crossed over to envy because of their way to produce cheap goods for unforeseen profit and market dominance. And might always stay on the xenophobia list because of distinctive eating habits.

Make no mistake: I am not a fan of either rampant capitalism nor totalitarian governments. The most exotic thing I’ve eaten is chicken feet (which people seem to forget are also a specialty in some Southern states). That being said, I can also spy a scapegoat when one is being dangled in front of my unmasked face. These are not mutually exclusive thoughts. Or they shouldn’t be.

Worrying Head of Facsim

Because nor am I a fan of the fascist playbook. It worked in Germany in World War II and the chief gear: scapegoating, is poised to churn again. And for an embattled president who already has a lot to answer for, renaming this disease is the perfect segue to deflect attention from the glaring ineptitude of the administration’s response to warnings of a looming crisis.

Calling this a Chinese virus plays up on many of the existing stereotypes for a specific advantage. And the main conspiracy theories point to the bigger picture: undermining the global Chinese position politically, economically, and socially. Who stands to benefit Iran-style embargoes against China? Iran, a country whose government the US has also returned to finding objectionable under this administration, and who is loosing hundreds of people by the day to this illness due to ongoing sanctions. The same senators (and their cronies) who dumped stock right after an intelligence briefing that the stock market was going to tumble.

The long and short of it is laying blame for a pandemic has far-reaching advantages. Getting to assign blame may be the most white privilege move yet.

Interestingly, guess who didn’t get blame during in 1918 for spreading the flu around the world? The United States of America or Great Britain or yes, China. Why do we call it that then? Because the media declared it so when the virus jumped from France to Spain.

Can you think of other reasons why a Chinese virus is a catchy title?